AOOSTAR Launches Affordable WTR Max NAS with Intel Core i5 for $559
Article / Laptops

AOOSTAR Launches Affordable WTR Max NAS with Intel Core i5 for $559

AOOSTAR introduces a new WTR Max model equipped with an Intel Core i5-1235U, priced at $559, making it $100 cheaper than the AMD variant.

The introduction of AOOSTAR's WTR Max has transformed the network-attached storage (NAS) device market. This model, now equipped with an Intel Core i5-1235U processor, is priced at $559, offering a more affordable alternative to its predecessor, which featured the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and was listed at $699. With the AMD version currently on sale for $659, the Intel model provides a $100 savings, making it appealing for those seeking a budget-friendly storage option.

Specifications and Performance

The WTR Max caters to diverse storage requirements, supporting up to six hard drives and five SSDs, along with two SODIMM slots that allow for a maximum of 96GB of non-ECC DDR5 memory. In contrast, the AMD version supports ECC memory and can accommodate up to 128GB. The Intel Core i5-1235U, a mid-range chip with a maximum turbo frequency of 4.4 GHz, falls short compared to the AMD’s higher clock speeds and integrated GPU capabilities, which could be crucial for users needing enhanced processing power.

The Intel model features dual-core performance with eight efficiency cores, collectively managing 12 threads. Its integrated Intel Iris Xe GPU is adequate for basic tasks but does not match the graphical performance of the AMD’s Radeon 780M. Customers must consider their performance needs against the cost savings when choosing between these two models.

Connectivity and Expansion

Both versions of the WTR Max come with a robust selection of ports, including two 10 Gigabit LAN ports and two 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet connections, ensuring fast data transfer in networked settings. The Intel model includes essential features such as five M.2 2280 slots for expandable storage and an efficient cooling system with four fans and a vapor chamber heat sink.

Although neither model includes built-in wireless capabilities, users can opt for a USB wireless adapter to enable connectivity. This design choice highlights the WTR Max’s emphasis on wired networking, often favored for NAS devices due to its reliability and speed.

Trade-offs and Considerations

When evaluating the benefits of the WTR Max with Intel processing, it’s important to recognize the trade-offs. The absence of ECC memory support in the Intel variant may raise concerns for users who prioritize data integrity, particularly in environments where data loss is critical. Its lower power and processing capabilities might not satisfy the needs of more demanding applications.

For individuals setting up a home server mainly for file storage and basic tasks, the Intel model presents a practical option that won’t strain the budget. It strikes a solid balance of features for those who do not require the extensive processing power offered by the AMD-powered version.

Conclusion

The AOOSTAR WTR Max with Intel Core i5 is available for $559, positioning it as an attractive choice for budget-conscious consumers in search of a capable NAS solution. While it may not rival the performance of its AMD counterpart, it offers sufficient features for everyday storage needs, making it a competitive option in the NAS market.

As AOOSTAR continues to innovate and expand its product line, the focus will likely remain on how these devices adapt to the changing demands of users looking for reliable and cost-effective storage solutions.

Quick answers

How does the Intel version compare to the AMD model?

The Intel version is priced at $559, making it $100 cheaper than the AMD model, which is currently $659. However, the AMD model offers superior processing power and ECC memory support.

When is the AOOSTAR WTR Max available?

The AOOSTAR WTR Max with the Intel Core i5-1235U is available now.

Is the Intel model suitable for heavy applications?

The Intel model's performance may be sufficient for basic tasks but may fall short for more demanding applications compared to the AMD version.

About the author

MJI Desk

MJI Desk covers consumer tech for MJI News.